Skip to content
recurance

Carl Foot

26 Oct 2015 · Coroner ME Hassell · London Inner (North)

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate response to cell bell

    “Between 1.53pm and 2.51pm on the afternoon of his death, Mr [name redacted] rang his cell bell 13 times.”
  2. 2. inadequate response to cell bell

    “The jury found that there was an inadequate response by prison officers to the cell bells, and that this was a contributory factor in [the deceased]'s death.”
  3. 3. lack of post-incident review of cell bell logs

    “In terms of learning lessons for the future, which may include learning by individual officers as well as on a systemic basis, there was no exploration immediately after [the deceased]'s death of the cell bell log and all those who heard/answered his bell that afternoon.”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Carl Foot · Recurance