Skip to content
recurance

Anthony Wood

3 Jun 2025 · Coroner John Taylor · South London

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. patient fall

    “the patient was identified as at high risk of a fall”
  2. 2. patient frailty

    “he was deemed to be severely frail (and hence at corresponding risk, if a fall were to occur)”
  3. 3. absence of crash mats

    “there were no crash mats at the side of his bed”
  4. 4. patient aggression

    “it was known that the patient had a propensity to push staff when being changed”
  5. 5. unsecured bed-rail

    “the bed-rail was not up when the patient was attended by a HCA acting alone”
  6. 6. insufficient staffing

    “the patient should have had the assistance of two members of staff, and not just one, when being prepared to be washed and changed”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error