Skip to content
recurance

Aaron Deeley

19 Jun 2024 · Coroner Sonia Hayes · Essex

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 2 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of assigned responsible clinician for patients held under section 5(2)

    “Patients admitted onto a ward at the acute Trust detained under various sections of the Mental Health Act have an allocated Responsible Clinician. As section 5 (2) is a holding power only, there is no Responsible Clinician allocated for a vulnerable patient being held pending assessment for consideration for detention under the Mental health Act”
  2. 2. absence of mental health liaison attendance during 72‑hour hold

    “During the waiting period of up to 72 hours, Mental Health Liaison will not attend the acute ward or make assessment of the presenting risks of self-harm”
  3. 3. untrained staff conducting mental health assessment

    “The acute care healthcare professionals do not have specialist mental health training to conduct a mental health assessment and the consequential presenting harm”
  4. 4. confusing policy on 1:1 observation for detained patients

    “There was confusion at the acute Trust as to what regime was required to ensure that a patient awaiting Mental Health Act assessment could be put under 1:1 observation. The Trust policy was confusing and did not cover patients like [the deceased]”
  5. 5. absence of joint protocol between trusts

    “There is no joint protocol to cover the working between the two Trusts on this issue as the referral for Mental Health Act assessment goes outside of both organisations”
  6. 6. gap in care for patients needing both physical and mental health services

    “There is a lacuna for patients awaiting Mental Health Act assessment and requiring simultaneous physical healthcare when a significant risk has been identified such that a patient may require detention for their own safety”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningMollie Stansfield19 Dec 2022 · 1 year 6 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

Earlier report

“There was a failure at Hull Royal Infirmary to understand the process of implementing Section 5(2) of the Mental Health act 1983 [MHA] (Doctors Holding Power) as well as general uncertainty about its significance and effect.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Patients admitted onto a ward at the acute Trust detained under various sections of the Mental Health Act have an allocated Responsible Clinician. As section 5 (2) is a holding power only, there is no Responsible Clinician allocated for a vulnerable patient being held pending assessment for consideration for detention under the Mental health Act.”
Full chain: Incomplete paperwork and missing responsible clinician for section 5(2) holds
Raised again laterNicholas Gray5 Jun 2025 · 1 year later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“During the waiting period of up to 72 hours, Mental Health Liaison will not attend the acute ward or make assessment of the presenting risks of self-harm”

Later report

“There was no record of the mental health liaison nurse review on 24 June 2023 and the discharge of Mr [name redacted] from EPUT.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Absence of mental health liaison during 72‑hour hold and missing discharge note
Raised again laterAbbigail Smith (3)27 May 2026 · 1 year 11 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high

This report

“The acute care healthcare professionals do not have specialist mental health training to conduct a mental health assessment and the consequential presenting harm.”

Later report

“There were not sufficient trained staff to conduct the enhanced observations required to monitor Abbi with her known risk of severe self-harm whilst she was awaiting assessment under the Mental Health Act and actively attempting to take her own life.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Untrained staff conducting mental health assessments

Responses

2024-0331-Response-from-Essex-Partnership-NHS.pdf ↗· Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust

Stated action · 23rd September 2024

“In order to strengthen collaborative working across the two Trusts, a project group for development of the 'joint protocol' is being put into place. The first meeting with attendees from both Trusts has been arranged for 23rd September 2024”

2024-0331-Response-from-Mid-and-South-Essex-NHS.pdf ↗· Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust

Stated action

“We have therefore added a new flowchart to our 'Admission & Treatment of Patients with a Mental Health Disorder in an Acute Hospital Setting' Policy. A copy of the flowchart is attached for reference.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error