Skip to content
recurance

Delayed or missing clinical observations in pediatric emergency care

Closely relatedConfidence 0.87 · high3 reports · 2024–2026 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health received 3 coroners' reports about this hazard between 16 Aug 2024 and 4 Mar 2026.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 2 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 2 of the 2 earlier reports, stating 6 specific actions.

3
reports
2
different coroners
2024–2026
years
0.87
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Daniel Klosi↗

    16 Aug 2024 · Mary Hassell · Inner North London

    “It was difficult for the nursing staff to obtain [the deceased]'s observations because he was so distressed. That was understandable, but because of the long wait in a busy department, it meant that on the fourth attendance [the deceased] did not have a full set of observations for over four hours and shortly afterwards suffered a catastrophic cardiovascular compromise.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health responded, stating 5 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “I intend to make a prevention of future deaths report”
    “We will continue to be strongly supportive of this initiative and support the need for early escalation of care for those patients in whom it is not possible to undertake vital signs.”

    3 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  2. 10 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Finlay Roberts↗

    20 Jun 2025 · Mary Hassell · Inner North London

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high
    “The lack of serial nursing observations was a fundamental omission from [the deceased]'s care.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:nursingobservationsdeceased's

    Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “We are currently in the process of audit, review and revision and update of these standards, to be published later in 2025.”

    Stated timescale: later in 2025

  3. 8 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Viviana-Ray Butnaru↗

    4 Mar 2026 · Jyoti Gill · Essex

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.87 · higha different coroner
    “Incomplete documentation to be addressed to include all updates from nursing staff in relation to observations and escalations; and handovers from the medical team to one another to be clearly recorded.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:nursingstaffobservations

    Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

  4. All reports to Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

Next

Other chains for Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error