Public access to live rail at platform end

Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals. ?Every quote shown was checked by code to appear word for word in the original report.

• 2016 → 2017Daniel Campbell8 months after Stephen Cahill · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate fencing or barriers that fail to deter access to the railway line. The earlier report cites a gate and fence offering little hindrance, while the later report notes broken, missing, or disrepaired fencing and walls.

  Stephen Cahill · 23 Aug 2016

  “The British Transport investigation revealed that the deceased gained | access to the railway line through an access gate. Both the gate and | fence provide little deterrence or hindrance to someone wanting to gain | access to the railway”

  Check it in the source

  Daniel Campbell · 13 Apr 2017

  “Photographs of the location where the death occurred, provided by British Transport Police show that various sections of fencing and walls separating the public footpath from the railway line were broken, missing or in disrepair.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “e We have commissioned works to enhance the fencing and gates in this area. These works will be delivered by 15”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2017Daniel Campbell8 months after Susan Hamlett · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight insufficient physical barriers that allow unwanted access to the railway line. The earlier case concerns a weak wooden gate, while the later case notes broken or missing fencing and walls.

  Susan Hamlett · 4 Aug 2016

  “The British Transport investigation revealed that the deceased gained | access to the railway line through an access gate at Lower Farm Road, Bromham, Bedfordshire”

  Check it in the source

  Daniel Campbell · 13 Apr 2017

  “Photographs of the location where the death occurred, provided by British Transport Police show that various sections of fencing and walls separating the public footpath from the railway line were broken, missing or in disrepair.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “In relation to the wooden gate, this gate will be upgraded by the 2° December 2016, as part of a comprehensive upgrade to the fencing at this site.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2017Daniel Campbell1 year 2 months after Jakovas Fofonovas · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate physical barriers that allow public access to the railway, creating a risk of trespass. The earlier report notes unimplemented recommendations to restrict access, while the later report observes existing fences and walls in disrepair.

  Jakovas Fofonovas · 26 Feb 2016

  “Recommendations in The BTP Post Fatality Report to create a safer environment at the bridge and restrict public access to the railway had not been effected by the time of the inquest.”

  Check it in the source

  Daniel Campbell · 13 Apr 2017

  “Photographs of the location where the death occurred, provided by British Transport Police show that various sections of fencing and walls separating the public footpath from the railway line were broken, missing or in disrepair.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “We are in the process of installing acoustic fencing on both sides of the track at a height of 3m. This will also have anti-climb wire extensions fitted as an additional deterrent at certain sections.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2017 → 2017Scott Rayner8 months after Daniel Campbell · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports point to inadequate fencing or barriers alongside the railway line that could allow trespass. They differ in the specific locations and contexts described.

  Daniel Campbell · 13 Apr 2017

  “Photographs of the location where the death occurred, provided by British Transport Police show that various sections of fencing and walls separating the public footpath from the railway line were broken, missing or in disrepair.”

  Check it in the source

  Scott Rayner · 20 Dec 2017

  “fencing beside the railway track was inadequate especially at the rear of a scrap metal dealer located off St Albans Road and Bedford Street”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “Network Rail has reviewed the active fencing proposals for upgrade on both sides of the track in the section where the incident occurred and have included these in our 2018 renewals plan”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2017Scott Rayner1 year 4 months after Stephen Cahill · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate fencing or gate security that allows easy trespass onto the railway line. The later report specifies a particular location near a scrap metal dealer, whereas the earlier report concerns a general access gate and fence.

  Stephen Cahill · 23 Aug 2016

  “The British Transport investigation revealed that the deceased gained | access to the railway line through an access gate. Both the gate and | fence provide little deterrence or hindrance to someone wanting to gain | access to the railway”

  Check it in the source

  Scott Rayner · 20 Dec 2017

  “British Transport Police investigating revealed that fencing beside the railway track was inadequate especially at the rear of a scrap metal dealer located off St Albans Road and Bedford Street, ieading toa risk that adults and children may trespass on the line where the speed limit is 100mph.”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2017Scott Rayner1 year 5 months after Susan Hamlett · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight insufficient barriers (a wooden gate and trackside fencing) that fail to deter trespass onto the railway. The core issue is inadequate fencing/gate allowing access, though the locations and specific barrier types differ.

  Susan Hamlett · 4 Aug 2016

  “The British Transport investigation revealed that the deceased gained | access to the railway line through an access gate at Lower Farm Road, Bromham, Bedfordshire. The gate is of wooden construction and | provides little deterrence or hindrance to someone wanting to gain access to the railway”

  Check it in the source

  Scott Rayner · 20 Dec 2017

  “British Transport Police investigating revealed that fencing beside the railway track was inadequate especially at the rear of a scrap metal dealer located off St Albans Road and Bedford Street, ieading toa risk that adults and children may trespass on the line where the speed limit is 100mph.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “In relation to the wooden gate, this gate will be upgraded by the 2° December 2016, as part of a comprehensive upgrade to the fencing at this site.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2017 → 2018Andrew Hanahoe1 year 2 months after Daniel Campbell · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate fencing or barriers that allow easy access to the railway line. They differ in the earlier focusing on existing disrepair and the later calling for new fencing alongside a footbridge.

  Daniel Campbell · 13 Apr 2017

  “Photographs of the location where the death occurred, provided by British Transport Police show that various sections of fencing and walls separating the public footpath from the railway line were broken, missing or in disrepair.”

  Check it in the source

  Andrew Hanahoe · 19 Jun 2018

  “If the crossing is a recognised”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “Network Rail has reviewed the active fencing proposals for upgrade on both sides of the track in the section where the incident occurred and have included these in our 2018 renewals plan”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2018Bartholomew Coleman2 years 4 months after Jakovas Fofonovas · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high

  Both reports highlight that the railway track can be accessed by the public from a bridge due to insufficient protective measures. The earlier report notes unimplemented recommendations to restrict access, while the later report describes a low wall and worn path that allow easy entry.

  Jakovas Fofonovas · 26 Feb 2016

  “Recommendations in The BTP Post Fatality Report to create a safer environment at the bridge and restrict public access to the railway had not been effected by the time of the inquest.”

  Check it in the source

  Bartholomew Coleman · 10 Jul 2018

  “I am concerned that the railway track is easily accessible to members of the public from this bridge.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “The new footbridge railings are at the current industry standard height of 1250mm.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2017 → 2018Kevin Sherwood9 months after Scott Rayner · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

  Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate fencing along the railway boundary that creates a risk of trespass. The earlier report cites insufficient fencing near a scrap metal dealer, while the later notes only post-and-wire fencing in an area used by dog walkers.

  Scott Rayner · 20 Dec 2017

  “fencing beside the railway track was inadequate especially at the rear of a scrap metal dealer located off St Albans Road and Bedford Street”

  Check it in the source

  Kevin Sherwood · 11 Sept 2018

  “Only post and wire fencing at the rallway boundary In this area. The areas on both sides off the tckneild Way, particularly to the west of the railway, are used by dog walkers and others”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “in line with this recommendation, an inspection was undertaken by Network Rail's local operations team on 17 May 2017 to establish ownership and condition of the boundary fencing”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2017 → 2018Kevin Sherwood1 year 5 months after Daniel Campbell · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate fencing or barriers between the railway and adjacent public areas, noting that the existing fencing is insufficient to deter trespass. The earlier report focuses on broken, missing, or disrepair fencing, while the later report notes only post-and-wire fencing is present.

  Daniel Campbell · 13 Apr 2017

  “Photographs of the location where the death occurred, provided by British Transport Police show that various sections of fencing and walls separating the public footpath from the railway line were broken, missing or in disrepair.”

  Check it in the source

  Kevin Sherwood · 11 Sept 2018

  “(1) Only post and wire fencing at the rallway boundary In this area. The areas on both sides off the tckneild Way, particularly to the west of the railway, are used by dog walkers and others.”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2019Steven Key2 years 6 months after Stephen Cahill · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

  Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

  Both reports highlight that inadequate fencing or gates allow easy access to the railway line, creating a trespass risk.

  Stephen Cahill · 23 Aug 2016

  “Both the gate and | fence provide little deterrence or hindrance to someone wanting to gain | access to the railway”

  Check it in the source

  Steven Key · 25 Feb 2019

  “The fencing at the scene of Mr [name redacted] death was a low wooden fence which was easy to climb over.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “e We have commissioned works to enhance the fencing and gates in this area. These works will be delivered by 15”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2019Steven Key3 years after Jakovas Fofonovas · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high

  Both reports highlight the need to stop members of the public from gaining unauthorised access to the railway line. They differ in the specific context – one concerns a bridge in London, the other a low wooden fence at a station in Cumbria.

  Jakovas Fofonovas · 26 Feb 2016

  “Recommendations in The BTP Post Fatality Report to create a safer environment at the bridge and restrict public access to the railway had not been effected by the time of the inquest.”

  Check it in the source

  Steven Key · 25 Feb 2019

  “(1) You have a duty under the Railway Safety (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 1997 to prevent access to the railway line so far as is reasonably practicable. (2) The fencing at the scene of Mr [name redacted] death was a low wooden fence which was easy to climb over.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “We are in the process of installing acoustic fencing on both sides of the track at a height of 3m. This will also have anti-climb wire extensions fitted as an additional deterrent at certain sections.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2017 → 2019Steven Key1 year 2 months after Scott Rayner · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate fencing alongside the railway that allows trespassing onto the line. The earlier case concerned a scrap metal dealer site, while the later case involved a low wooden fence at a station location.

  Scott Rayner · 20 Dec 2017

  “fencing beside the railway track was inadequate especially at the rear of a scrap metal dealer located off St Albans Road and Bedford Street”

  Check it in the source

  Steven Key · 25 Feb 2019

  “The fencing at the scene of Mr [name redacted] death was a low wooden fence which was easy to climb over.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “in line with this recommendation, an inspection was undertaken by Network Rail's local operations team on 17 May 2017 to establish ownership and condition of the boundary fencing”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2019Steven Key2 years 7 months after Susan Hamlett · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight that a wooden fence or gate at the site offers insufficient resistance to prevent unauthorized access to the railway line. The later report notes the same type of barrier remains easy to climb, while the earlier report described the gate as providing little deterrence.

  Susan Hamlett · 4 Aug 2016

  “The gate is of wooden construction and | provides little deterrence or hindrance to someone wanting to gain access to the railway”

  Check it in the source

  Steven Key · 25 Feb 2019

  “The fencing at the scene of Mr [name redacted] death was a low wooden fence which was easy to climb over.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “In relation to the wooden gate, this gate will be upgraded by the 2° December 2016, as part of a comprehensive upgrade to the fencing at this site.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2017 → 2019Steven Key1 year 10 months after Daniel Campbell · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate fencing or barriers that allow public access to the railway line, creating a risk of trespass and potential harm. The earlier report notes broken, missing, or disrepaired fencing and walls, while the later report describes a low wooden fence that is easy to climb.

  Daniel Campbell · 13 Apr 2017

  “Photographs of the location where the death occurred, provided by British Transport Police show that various sections of fencing and walls separating the public footpath from the railway line were broken, missing or in disrepair.”

  Check it in the source

  Steven Key · 25 Feb 2019

  “The fencing at the scene of Mr [name redacted] death was a low wooden fence which was easy to climb over.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “Network Rail has reviewed the active fencing proposals for upgrade on both sides of the track in the section where the incident occurred and have included these in our 2018 renewals plan”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2018 → 2019Steven Key8 months after Bartholomew Coleman · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight that existing barriers are insufficient to prevent public access to the railway line, creating a risk of injury or death from trains.

  Bartholomew Coleman · 10 Jul 2018

  “I am concerned that the railway track is easily accessible to members of the public from this bridge.”

  Check it in the source

  Steven Key · 25 Feb 2019

  “The fencing at the scene of Mr [name redacted] death was a low wooden fence which was easy to climb over.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “Network Rail is planning to apply mitigation measures (wire mesh panels with base plated fence posts fixed to the top of the parapet walls) to the parapet walls to further deter access to the track below. An order has now been placed with Network Rail's framework contractors in respect of these works, with an anticipated completion date of the end of September 2018.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2018 → 2019Carl Klimaytys1 year after Taiyah-Grace Peebles · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight the danger posed by exposed live rails at ground level that can cause electrocution. The earlier report stresses the lack of a physical barrier, while the later report calls for better signage to inform the public about the rail's presence.

  Taiyah-Grace Peebles · 24 Jul 2018

  “The absence of an end of platform barrier and the existence of a live rail at ground level that might be accessible to members of the public”

  Check it in the source

  Carl Klimaytys · 7 Aug 2019

  “found that [the deceased] died instantly as a result of electrocution when he came in contact with the electric rail at 0557 hrs on the 23 December, 2018.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “In your report, you state that”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2018 → 2020Jordan Aira1 year 8 months after Taiyah-Grace Peebles · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

  Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

  Both reports highlight the lack of a barrier at the platform end that allows public access to the live rail. This creates a risk of contact with the electrified track.

  Taiyah-Grace Peebles · 24 Jul 2018

  “The absence of an end of platform barrier and the existence of a live rail at ground level that might be accessible to members of the public may in my opinion create a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken”

  Check it in the source

  Jordan Aira · 30 Mar 2020

  “There were no physical boundaries at the end of the platform preventing members of the public accessing the railway tracks.”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2018 → 2020Jordan Aira1 year 9 months after Bartholomew Coleman · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight insufficient physical barriers that allow members of the public to access the railway track. The earlier case points to a gap at a bridge, while the later case notes missing protection near an emergency telephone.

  Bartholomew Coleman · 10 Jul 2018

  “There is a trodden path through the undergrowth from the wall to the train track, indicating that that this is a route that has been used by others to access this area.”

  Check it in the source

  Jordan Aira · 30 Mar 2020

  “The emergency telephone which may be used by members of the public is located adjacent to the railway track.”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2020Jordan Aira4 years 1 month after Jakovas Fofonovas · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight insufficient measures to stop members of the public from gaining access to the railway tracks. The earlier report focuses on missing bridge safeguards, while the later report notes absent platform-end boundaries.

  Jakovas Fofonovas · 26 Feb 2016

  “Recommendations in The BTP Post Fatality Report to create a safer environment”

  Check it in the source

  Jordan Aira · 30 Mar 2020

  “There were no physical boundaries at the end of the platform preventing”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “over At the shoulder of the steps/ramps and the main span there is an anti-climb guard at a greater height than the railings as further mitigation. In addition there is the acoustic fencing and anti-climb wire extensions to prevent anyone accessing the track if they were to climb over”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2017 → 2020Jordan Aira3 years after Daniel Campbell · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight insufficient physical barriers that allow public access to the railway tracks, creating a risk of trespass. The earlier report focuses on broken fencing and walls along a footpath, while the later report notes missing boundaries at a platform end.

  Daniel Campbell · 13 Apr 2017

  “Photographs of the location where the death occurred, provided by British Transport Police show that various sections of fencing and walls separating the public footpath from the railway line were broken, missing or in disrepair.”

  Check it in the source

  Jordan Aira · 30 Mar 2020

  “There were no physical boundaries at the end of the platform preventing members of the public accessing the railway tracks.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “Network Rail has reviewed the active fencing proposals for upgrade on both sides of the track in the section where the incident occurred and have included these in our 2018 renewals plan”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2020 → 2021Callum Evans1 year 2 months after Jordan Aira · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

  Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate warning signage about the lethal risk of touching the live electrified rail.

  Jordan Aira · 30 Mar 2020

  “The warning signs in place which are standard in the rail industry do not in terms warn of the risk of immediate death if you touch the live rail”

  Check it in the source

  Callum Evans · 18 May 2021

  “The railway station has an absence of signage stating the presence and risk to life of a live rail on the railway tracks which can be seen by those entering the railway station or whilst on the central part of the platform”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2018 → 2021Callum Evans2 years 10 months after Taiyah-Grace Peebles · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.86 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.86 · high

  Both reports highlight the danger posed by an exposed live (third) rail at ground level on railway platforms.

  Taiyah-Grace Peebles · 24 Jul 2018

  “The absence of an end of platform barrier and the existence of a live rail at ground level that might be accessible to members of the public may in my opinion create a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken”

  Check it in the source

  Callum Evans · 18 May 2021

  “The railway station has an absence of signage stating the presence and risk to life of a live rail on the railway tracks which can be seen by those entering the railway station or whilst on the central part of the platform”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2019 → 2021Christine Gould2 years 3 months after Steven Key · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

  Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight the risk of individuals climbing the boundary fence to gain access to the railway line. They concern the same hazard: inadequate fencing that can be easily climbed.

  Steven Key · 25 Feb 2019

  “(2) The fencing at the scene of Mr [name redacted] death was a low wooden fence which was easy to climb over.”

  Check it in the source

  Christine Gould · 28 May 2021

  “(3) I am concerned that your investigation into, and consideration of, [name redacted]' death did not keep a sufficiently open mind that she may have climbed the boundary fence to access the railway line.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “seriously and has taken additional measures beyond those required by its standards, to install additional meshing and netting at this location to act as an increased deterrent to climbing”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2018 → 2024Vanessa Ford5 years 8 months after Bartholomew Coleman · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight that members of the public can readily access the railway tracks from a bridge or wall structure. The later report notes similar accessibility issues despite existing mitigation measures.

  Bartholomew Coleman · 10 Jul 2018

  “I am concerned that the railway track is easily accessible to members of the public from this bridge.”

  Check it in the source

  Vanessa Ford · 4 Mar 2024

  “The concern here is that there is evidence to suggest that access to the railway tracks by members of the public may be a frequent issue in this vicinity.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “Network Rail is planning to apply mitigation measures (wire mesh panels with base plated fence posts fixed to the top of the parapet walls) to the parapet walls to further deter access to the track below. An order has now been placed with Network Rail's framework contractors in respect of these works, with an anticipated completion date of the end of September 2018.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2017 → 2024Vanessa Ford6 years 2 months after Scott Rayner · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight insufficient physical barriers that allow members of the public to access the railway tracks. The earlier report cites inadequate fencing near a scrap metal dealer, while the later report points to a low wall and accessible electrical box facilitating entry.

  Scott Rayner · 20 Dec 2017

  “fencing beside the railway track was inadequate especially at the rear of a scrap metal dealer located off St Albans Road and Bedford Street”

  Check it in the source

  Vanessa Ford · 4 Mar 2024

  “evidence to suggest that access to the railway tracks by members of the public may be a frequent issue in this vicinity”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2020 → 2024Vanessa Ford3 years 11 months after Jordan Aira · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

  Both reports highlight insufficient physical protection that allows members of the public to access railway tracks. The earlier report cites missing platform-end boundaries, while the later report points to a low wall and street furniture that facilitate trespass.

  Jordan Aira · 30 Mar 2020

  “There were no physical boundaries at the end of the platform preventing members of the public accessing the railway tracks.”

  Check it in the source

  Vanessa Ford · 4 Mar 2024

  “The concern here is that there is evidence to suggest that access to the railway tracks by members of the public may be a frequent issue in this vicinity.”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2016 → 2024Vanessa Ford8 years after Jakovas Fofonovas · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

  Both reports highlight that members of the public can gain access to the railway tracks in the area. The earlier report notes unimplemented recommendations to restrict access, while the later report points to existing physical mitigations that proved ineffective.

  Jakovas Fofonovas · 26 Feb 2016

  “Recommendations in The BTP Post Fatality Report to create a safer environment at the bridge and restrict public access to the railway had not been effected by the time of the inquest.”

  Check it in the source

  Vanessa Ford · 4 Mar 2024

  “I was provided with evidence that there have been three (non-fatal) incidents in the vicinity of the Hackney Central/Dalston Kingsland areas of the rail network in the 12 months prior to this incident on 23 September 2023”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “We are in the process of installing acoustic fencing on both sides of the track at a height of 3m. This will also have anti-climb wire extensions fitted as an additional deterrent at certain sections.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2020 → 2025Jody Robb5 years 3 months after Jordan Aira · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

  Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight the absence of effective physical barriers at the platform edge that allow members of the public to access the railway area.

  Jordan Aira · 30 Mar 2020

  “There were no physical boundaries at the end of the platform preventing members of the public accessing the railway tracks.”

  Check it in the source

  Jody Robb · 1 Jul 2025

  “Access to the [REDACTED] from the platform is not sufficiently barred or impeded to the public.”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app