Skip to content
recurance

Unrestricted sale of helium gas canisters

Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high2 reports · 2014–2022 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Home Office received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 9 Jul 2014 and 30 Aug 2022.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2014–2022
years
0.95
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    David Giles↗

    9 Jul 2014 · Zafar Siddique · Birmingham & Solihull

    “The sale of Helium gas canisters is readily available to members of the general 1 public with no apparent restrictions or conditions on sale or place.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Home Office responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  2. 8 years 2 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    David Honnor↗

    30 Aug 2022 · Stephen Nicholls · Dorset

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · higha different coroner
    “There is no restriction on members of the public purchasing these items.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:memberspublic

    Home Office responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Home Office

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error