Skip to content
recurance

Missing pedestrian crossing on busy ring road

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high3 reports · 2015–2026No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

National Highways received 3 coroners' reports about this hazard between 26 Oct 2015 and 8 Jun 2026.

They came from 3 different coroners in 3 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 2 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 2 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

3
reports
3
different coroners
2015–2026
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Neil Garry↗

    26 Oct 2015 · Melanie Williamson · West Yorkshire (East)

    “There is no pedestrian crossing at, or in the vicinity of, Ramshead Approach in Leeds. The Ring Road (A6120) is a busy road in that particular area and is frequently”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    National Highways responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  2. 1 year 10 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Frederick Dudley↗

    16 Aug 2017 · Margaret Jones · Staffordshire (South)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “The deceased had alighted from a bus and was crossing the very busy A449 dual carriageway at an uncontrolled pedestrian crossing point. The crossing is :”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:crossingbusypedestrian

    No published response from National Highways was found for this report.

  3. 8 years 10 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Charlotte Saunders↗

    8 Jun 2026 · Lindsey Tonks · Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “There are no pedestrian guardrails either side of the carriageway at what appears to be a primary location used by people for their speed and convenience, to avoid the need to walk further to use the pedestrian crossings”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    National Highways responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  4. All reports to National Highways

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error