Skip to content
recurance

Lack of risk assessment documentation and updates

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate3 reports · 2015–2019No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust received 3 coroners' reports about this hazard between 9 Jul 2015 and 12 Mar 2019.

They came from 3 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 2 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 2 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

3
reports
3
different coroners
2015–2019
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Toni Piel↗

    9 Jul 2015 · Matthew Cox · Manchester (North)

    “No assessment of the risk factors in discharging the deceased was documented in the deceased's records.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  2. 2 years 5 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    John Lea↗

    28 Nov 2017 · Lisa Hashmi · Manchester (North)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “In this case, critical risk assessments had not been updated and/or completed (falls, cot sides etc.) There were missed opportunities to re-assess.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust was found for this report.

  3. 1 year 3 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Marjorie Gartside↗

    12 Mar 2019 · Catherine McKenna · Manchester (North)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “That the information provided by the Royal Oldham Hospital to the Home on 10 October 2018 was inaccurate in suggesting that Mrs [name redacted] was able to mobilise.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  4. All reports to Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error