Incompatible IT systems hinder clinical information exchange
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 27 Aug 2015 and 25 Jul 2018.
They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.
No published response from Stockport NHS Foundation Trust was found for the earlier reports.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“The computerised note keeping system used in the Emergency Department is not able to”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ No published response from Stockport NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report.
- 2 years 11 months laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.85 · higha different coroner
“The I.T systems of the pathology department of the Trust and other hospital Trusts were incompatible with each other. This meant that transfer of information between trusts to obtain a second opinion were more difficult.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.
- All reports to Stockport NHS Foundation Trust
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2015 → 2018Robert Wrinch2 years 11 months after Frederick Sutton · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · highBoth reports highlight that incompatible IT systems hinder the exchange of clinical information. The earlier report concerns the emergency department’s inability to share data with the rest of the hospital, while the later report describes pathology IT systems that cannot communicate with other trusts.
Frederick Sutton · 27 Aug 2015
“The computerised note keeping system used in the Emergency Department is not able to”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Robert Wrinch · 25 Jul 2018
“The I.T systems of the pathology department of the Trust and other hospital Trusts were incompatible with each other. This meant that transfer of information between trusts to obtain a second opinion were more difficult.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
No published response from Stockport NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report.
No published response from Stockport NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report. It is the most recent report, so a response may not be due or published yet.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to Stockport NHS Foundation Trust at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 → 2018 | 0.69 | 0.05 | Closely related · 0.85 | different |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
Other chains for Stockport NHS Foundation Trust
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.