Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate shift handover communication leading to missed critical patient details

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2019–2026 One-page brief (print or PDF)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 19 Jun 2019 and 12 Feb 2026.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2019–2026
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    James Francis↗

    19 Jun 2019 · Penelope Schofield · West Sussex

    “both key support workers who knew Mr [name redacted] best failed to carry out the 30 minute observations during the morning and afternoon shifts”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The guideline is currently undergoing a surveillance review exercise to determine whether It should be updated As a result of your report, the review Is likely to conclude that an update is required so that it is clearer that the guideline applies to indirect head injury (for example, by making the definition more accessible to users) A final surveillance review decision Is due to be published in September 2019”

    Stated timescale: September 2019

  2. 6 years 8 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    James Fitzpatrick↗

    12 Feb 2026 · Rachael Griffin · Dorset

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “pertinent general information about [name redacted] was missing from that handover sheet”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error