Inadequate communication between clinical staff and families
Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust received 4 coroners' reports about this hazard between 7 Jan 2014 and 4 Mar 2016.
They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 3 times after the first warning.
A published response was found for 2 of the 3 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“There was generally poor communication between nursing and medical staff (inter se) and between medical/nursing staff and the family of the patient.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ No published response from Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report.
- 10 months laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
“There was extremely poor communication between hospital staff and the patient (and her family), and between and amongst themselves.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:poorcommunicationbetweenstaffpatientfamily
Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗
- 1 year 4 months laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
“There was no apparent handover from the hospital to this ward, as to the individual needs of the patient, and the staff were therefore placed in an impossible position.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:handoverhospitalpatientstaff
Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗
- 0 months laterIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
“There was clear evidence that the medical staff were not reading (or even looking at) the nursing notes, and the nurses were similarly not looking at the medical entries.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:medicalstaffnursing
Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗
- All reports to Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2014 → 2014Agnes Hannan10 months after James Withers · same coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight deficient communication between healthcare staff and patients/families. The later report adds concerns about inadequate handover and poor documentation, but the core hazard remains poor communication.
James Withers · 7 Jan 2014
“There was generally poor communication between nursing and medical staff (inter se) and between medical/nursing staff and the family of the patient.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Agnes Hannan · 27 Oct 2014
“There was extremely poor communication between hospital staff and the patient (and her family), and between and amongst themselves.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ 2014 → 2016Edith Kirkham1 year 4 months after Agnes Hannan · same coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderateBoth reports highlight failures in transferring patient information and ensuring proper handover between care settings. The earlier report cites poor communication and inadequate notes across the hospital, while the later report points to absent handover from hospital to an intermediate care ward.
Agnes Hannan · 27 Oct 2014
“There was extremely poor communication between hospital staff and the patient (and her family), and between and amongst themselves. There was evidence of a lack of handover between staff, and this was exacerbated by the fact that the medical and nursing notes were frequently inadequate.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Edith Kirkham · 23 Feb 2016
“There was no apparent handover from the hospital to this ward, as to the individual needs of the patient, and the staff were therefore placed in an impossible position.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ 2014 → 2016Edith Kirkham2 years 2 months after James Withers · same coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderateBoth reports highlight failures in transferring essential patient information between teams, leading to compromised care.
James Withers · 7 Jan 2014
“There was generally poor communication between nursing and medical staff (inter se) and between medical/nursing staff and the family of the patient.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Edith Kirkham · 23 Feb 2016
“There was no apparent handover from the hospital to this ward, as to the individual needs of the patient, and the staff were therefore placed in an impossible position.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ 2014 → 2016Ranjan Mistry2 years 2 months after James Withers · same coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight a breakdown in communication where clinical staff fail to read or consider each other's notes. The core issue is the lack of effective information exchange between nursing and medical teams.
James Withers · 7 Jan 2014
“There was generally poor communication between nursing and medical staff (inter se) and between medical/nursing staff and the family of the patient.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Ranjan Mistry · 4 Mar 2016
“There was clear evidence that the medical staff were not reading (or even looking at) the nursing notes, and the nurses were similarly not looking at the medical entries.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ 2014 → 2016Ranjan Mistry1 year 4 months after Agnes Hannan · same coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderateBoth reports highlight failures in communication through medical and nursing documentation, specifically that staff do not adequately review or rely on each other's notes.
Agnes Hannan · 27 Oct 2014
“There was extremely poor communication between hospital staff and the patient (and her family), and between and amongst themselves. There was evidence of a lack of handover between staff, and this was exacerbated by the fact that the medical and nursing notes were frequently inadequate.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Ranjan Mistry · 4 Mar 2016
“There was clear evidence that the medical staff were not reading (or even looking at) the nursing notes, and the nurses were similarly not looking at the medical entries.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
No published response from Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 → 2014 | 0.84 | 0.25 | Closely related · 0.90 | same |
| 2014 → 2016 | 0.82 | 0.12 | Closely related · 0.80 | same |
| 2014 → 2016 | 0.71 | 0.02 | Closely related · 0.80 | same |
| 2014 → 2016 | 0.81 | 0.18 | Identical · 0.90 | same |
| 2014 → 2016 | 0.85 | 0.18 | Closely related · 0.80 | same |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.