Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate communication between clinical staff and families

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate4 reports · 2014–2016No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust received 4 coroners' reports about this hazard between 7 Jan 2014 and 4 Mar 2016.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 3 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 2 of the 3 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

4
reports
1
coroner
2014–2016
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    James Withers↗

    7 Jan 2014 · John Pollard · Manchester (South)

    “There was generally poor communication between nursing and medical staff (inter se) and between medical/nursing staff and the family of the patient.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report.

  2. 10 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Agnes Hannan↗

    27 Oct 2014 · John Pollard · Manchester (South)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “There was extremely poor communication between hospital staff and the patient (and her family), and between and amongst themselves.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:poorcommunicationbetweenstaffpatientfamily

    Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. 1 year 4 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Edith Kirkham↗

    23 Feb 2016 · John Pollard · Manchester (South)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
    “There was no apparent handover from the hospital to this ward, as to the individual needs of the patient, and the staff were therefore placed in an impossible position.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:handoverhospitalpatientstaff

    Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  4. 0 months later

    Raised again · 3rd time

    Ranjan Mistry↗

    4 Mar 2016 · John Pollard · Manchester (South)

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
    “There was clear evidence that the medical staff were not reading (or even looking at) the nursing notes, and the nurses were similarly not looking at the medical entries.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:medicalstaffnursing

    Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  5. All reports to Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error