Skip to content
recurance

60mph speed limit in residential area with petrol station and hotel

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2015–2024No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Staffordshire County Council received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 29 Oct 2015 and 13 Aug 2024.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from Staffordshire County Council was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2015–2024
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Florence Lowe↗

    29 Oct 2015 · Anthony Curzon · Stoke-on-Trent & North Staffordshire

    “During the course of the evidence my attention was drawn to the fact that the road is only subject to the statutory limit of 6Omph whilst it has residential properties at places along its length, a busy petrol station and large fay-by southbound and a busy hotel northbound on joining the A519 upon leaving the M6 at junction 15.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Staffordshire County Council was found for this report.

  2. 8 years 9 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Kial Thurman↗

    13 Aug 2024 · Nicholas Walker · Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “The rural, unlit road is governed by the national speed limit of 60 mph and narrows in both directions at the point of the bridge.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:roadlimit

    Staffordshire County Council responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “A site visit with representatives from Staffordshire County Council Highways has taken place to review the layout of the road and consider the points raised through the PFD report submitted.”
  3. All reports to Staffordshire County Council

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error