Lack of emergency alarm or communication device
Wolverhampton City Council received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 3 Apr 2020 and 25 Aug 2022.
They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.
No published response from Wolverhampton City Council was found for the earlier reports.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“buzzer/alarm in the deceased room had been removed/disabled due to a previous incident where the deceased had attempted to place the cord around her neck.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ No published response from Wolverhampton City Council was found for this report.
- 2 years 5 months laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
“There was no emergency bell/alarm or telephone in the residents' dining room.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Wolverhampton City Council responded.Response (PDF) ↗
- All reports to Wolverhampton City Council
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2020 → 2022Charles Evans2 years 5 months after Edna Davenport · same coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight the absence of an emergency alarm or communication device that would allow residents to call for help. The earlier case concerns a disabled buzzer in a bedroom, while the later case notes no bell/alarm or telephone in the dining room.
Edna Davenport · 3 Apr 2020
“buzzer/alarm in the deceased room had been removed/disabled due to a previous incident where the deceased had attempted to place the cord around her neck.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Charles Evans · 25 Aug 2022
“There was no emergency bell/alarm or telephone in the residents' dining room.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
No published response from Wolverhampton City Council was found for this report.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to Wolverhampton City Council at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 → 2022 | 0.77 | 0.09 | Closely related · 0.90 | same |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.