Skip to content
recurance

Delayed and incomplete nursing documentation

Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high2 reports · 2014–2014 One-page brief (print or PDF)

City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 13 Mar 2014 and 24 Sept 2014.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 4 specific actions.

2
reports
1
coroner
2014–2014
years
0.85
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Jean James↗

    13 Mar 2014 · Derek Winters · Sunderland

    “The time taken to complete the initial documentation was longer than it ought to have been given the interruptions to the process.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 4 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗

    “the Trust has undertaken the following actions: 1) We have reviewed the hospital information system, known as MEDITECH V6 to find a solution to prevent further risk for patients who on assessment are at risk of developing a venous thromboembolism episode (VTE). The proposal is for the VTE assessment screen to automatically move to the prescription screen if a patient has been identified as being at risk. The medical staff will be required to complete the prescription for the thromboprophylaxis”

    Stated timescale: end of May 2014

    “2) We have introduced a new format for clinical handover of patients from the Acute Medical Unit to their base ward. This acuity handover tool is patient focused and highlights key indicators regarding the patient's healthcare needs, and treatment plan.”

    2 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  2. 6 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Leonard Hudson↗

    24 Sept 2014 · coroner not stated · Sunderland

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · higha different coroner
    “The nursing documentation was not as comprehensive as it ought to have been.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:documentationought

    The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.

  3. All reports to City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error