Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate foreign body management guidance

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2024–2025 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 5 Jan 2024 and 24 Oct 2025.

They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2024–2025
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Tammy Watkins↗

    5 Jan 2024 · Laurinda Bower · Nottingham and Nottinghamshire

    “A lack of robust policy relating to Ingestion of Foreign Bodies I heard evidence that the Trust is in the process of drafting a policy, but it became clear during evidence that the policy is not yet sufficiently robust.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The Trust have recognised the need to fully review how and what physical healthcare is offered across all inpatient services and successfully recruited an Associated Director of Physical Healthcare last year. This is a strategic post and covers all three care groups. Their initial priority has been to scope all physical health models of care across inpatient services with the aim of understanding the unique needs of patients across our services. The next phase will look to address the associated”

    Stated timescale: next 12 months

  2. 1 year 10 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Sophie Towle↗

    24 Oct 2025 · Alexandra Poutney · Nottingham and Nottinghamshire

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “I have had sight of the newly ratified local policy for management of insertion of foreign objects at SFH. I am concerned that its content is lacking in specificity, the language used is vague and open to interpretation, and it does not provide clear advice for medical professionals accessing it for guidance.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:policyforeignclear

    Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error