Delay in declaring missing and informing police
Sussex Partnership NHS Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 21 Aug 2013 and 18 Jan 2018.
They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.
A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“concern was raised by the family with regard to the length of time taken before Mr [name redacted] could be declared missing and the police informed.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Sussex Partnership NHS Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗
“we have since revised the documents clinicians are asked to complete. This is to ensure they are less repetitive and better support succinct recording of relevant issues. Regular audits are completed to ensure adequate standards are met.”
- 4 years 5 months laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
“Need for clear information to be given by hospital staff when making the 999 call to report a patient has gone AWOL”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Sussex Partnership NHS Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗
- All reports to Sussex Partnership NHS Trust
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2013 → 2018Paul Hanton4 years 5 months after John Walker · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight shortcomings in the hospital's AWOL reporting process that delay police notification. The earlier report cites a delay in declaring a patient missing; the later report stresses the need for clear information during the 999 call to enable swift police action.
John Walker · 21 Aug 2013
“concern was raised by the family with regard to the length of time taken before Mr [name redacted] could be declared missing and the police informed.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Paul Hanton · 18 Jan 2018
“Need for clear information to be given by hospital staff when making the 999 call to report a patient has gone AWOL”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Stated action in the response to the earlier report
“we have since revised the documents clinicians are asked to complete. This is to ensure they are less repetitive and better support succinct recording of relevant issues. Regular audits are completed to ensure adequate standards are met.”
Stated action
“we have since revised the documents clinicians are asked to complete. This is to ensure they are less repetitive and better support succinct recording of relevant issues. Regular audits are completed to ensure adequate standards are met.”
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to Sussex Partnership NHS Trust at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 → 2018 | 0.72 | 0.07 | Closely related · 0.90 | different |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
Other chains for Sussex Partnership NHS Trust
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.