Inadequate street lighting at junction

Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals. ?Every quote shown was checked by code to appear word for word in the original report.

• 2014 → 2015Julios Catachanas1 year 1 month after Sean Morley · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.86 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.86 · high

  Both reports highlight the absence of street lighting as a safety concern for pedestrians and cyclists. The earlier report focuses on a stretch of the A444 road, while the later report concerns a specific junction lacking lighting.

  Sean Morley · 24 Mar 2014

  “There are no street lights. The speed limit on the road is 7Omph.”

  Check it in the source

  Julios Catachanas · 1 May 2015

  “| was concemed that street lighting was not present at this junction”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “The feasibility study is expected to be completed by the end of September 2014.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2014 → 2018Neil Jones4 years 2 months after Sean Morley · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight that the road lacks adequate protection for pedestrians and cyclists, creating a risk of fatal collisions. The later report notes ongoing fatalities despite a lower speed limit, while the earlier report cites missing signs, lighting, and barriers.

  Sean Morley · 24 Mar 2014

  “There are no signs warning pedestrians or cyclists of the dangers of using the road. There are no street lights. The speed limit on the road is 7Omph. There is no barrier or other protective features between the vehicular traffic and pedestrians”

  Check it in the source

  Neil Jones · 25 May 2018

  “In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths wilf occur unless action is taken.”

  Check it in the source

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2014 → 2018Laila Habibi and Daniel Ghafuri4 years 6 months after Sean Morley · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

  Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight the lack of adequate warning signage on the road as a safety concern. The earlier report notes absent signs warning pedestrians and cyclists, while the later report points out the missing illuminated 'single carriageway' warning sign.

  Sean Morley · 24 Mar 2014

  “There are no signs warning pedestrians or cyclists of the dangers of using the road. There are no street lights. The speed limit on the road is 7Omph. There is no barrier or other protective features between the vehicular traffic and pedestrians”

  Check it in the source

  Laila Habibi and Daniel Ghafuri · 13 Sept 2018

  “that this road is a regular diversion route from the M1 motorway hence periodically, receives usually large volumes of traffic (3) an absence of an illuminated 'single carriageway' warning sign”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “The feasibility study is expected to be completed by the end of September 2014.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2015 → 2023Mason Williams8 years 6 months after Julios Catachanas · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports identify inadequate street lighting contributing to road traffic collisions. The earlier case notes lighting was absent at a junction, while the later case describes lighting failure due to a cable fault.

  Julios Catachanas · 1 May 2015

  “was concemed that street lighting was not present at this junction”

  Check it in the source

  Mason Williams · 10 Nov 2023

  “The street lighting along Trinity Road, Piccadilly, nr Kingsbury was not illuminated at the time of the Road Traffic Collision due to a fault.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “The County Council has taken very seriously your report and the concerns raised in it. I do hope that through the measures the Council is proposing to implement you, and the family of Mr [name redacted], can be assured of the County Council's commitment to reducing the number of such tragedies in the future.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app

• 2014 → 2023Mason Williams9 years 8 months after Sean Morley · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

  Both reports highlight inadequate street lighting as a safety hazard for pedestrians and cyclists. The earlier report notes a general absence of lighting on the A444, while the later report describes a specific lighting fault on Trinity Road.

  Sean Morley · 24 Mar 2014

  “There are no signs warning pedestrians or cyclists of the dangers of using the road. There are no street lights. The speed limit on the road is 7Omph. There is no barrier or other protective features between the vehicular traffic and pedestrians”

  Check it in the source

  Mason Williams · 10 Nov 2023

  “The street lighting along Trinity Road, Piccadilly, nr Kingsbury was not illuminated at the time of the Road Traffic Collision due to a fault.”

  Check it in the source

  Stated action in the response to the earlier report

  “The feasibility study is expected to be completed by the end of September 2014.”

  Earlier report in the app · Later report in the app