Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate ACCT training and knowledge gaps

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2024–2026 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Practice Plus Group received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 4 Dec 2024 and 4 Jan 2026.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 2 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2024–2026
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Kayleigh Melhuish↗

    4 Dec 2024 · M.E. Voisin · Avon

    “there was little understanding of the requirement to complete or review the care plan and support actions at every ACCT review not just the planned reviews;”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Practice Plus Group responded, stating 2 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “We have carefully considered the potential for implementing changes to SystmOne to include a tick-box to confirm the review of the care plan and support actions.”
    “We have recruited Neurodiversity Support Managers (NSMs) across the prison estate to ensure that support for neurodiverse prisoners is consistent across all education, skills and work opportunities as well as the wider prison. One of the main responsibilities of the NSMs is to provide training and support for other prison staff to help them better understand and support those with neurodivergent needs within the prison.”
  2. 1 year 1 month later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Rickie Poon↗

    4 Jan 2026 · Mary Hassell · Inner North London

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “- the ACCT process was not managed and implemented properly, e.g. supervising officers did not consistently acquaint themselves with case notes or history when completing reviews;”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:ACCTreviews

    Practice Plus Group responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Practice Plus Group

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error