Skip to content
recurance

Misleading layout leading to pedestrians to look wrong direction

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2016–2017 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Transport for London received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 19 Aug 2016 and 28 Nov 2017.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 2 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2016–2017
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Amanda Coppen↗

    19 Aug 2016 · Philip Barlow · London Inner (South)

    “The evidence was that this layout could mislead road users (pedestrians and motorists) into believing that this is a standard dual carriageway. Ordinary traffic has been seen in the dedicated busway, and pedestrians could be misled into looking the wrong way”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Transport for London responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “A zebra crossing was installed on 15 March 2016, south of, but close to, the junction, to provide an additional crossing from the Millennium Village area to the existing primary school, and a safer crossing route between Pilot Busway and West Parkside.”

    Stated timescale: 15 March 2016

  2. 1 year 3 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Sonia Stante↗

    28 Nov 2017 · Jacqueline Devonish · London Inner (North)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “(1) No road markings indicating the direction pedestrians should look when crossing”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:roadpedestrians

    Transport for London responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “Subsequent to this visit, additional louvres were fitted on 13 October 2017 to two further green figure light aspects on the Pentonville Road crossing, including on the north side of the crossing (see Figure 2), to reduce the likelihood of pedestrians crossing when they were not invited”

    Stated timescale: 13 October 2017

  3. All reports to Transport for London

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error