Skip to content
recurance

Ambulance resource shortage delays urgent patient transfers

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2016–2020 One-page brief (print or PDF)

East Midlands Ambulance Service received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 26 May 2016 and 4 Feb 2020.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 2 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2016–2020
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Peter Scott↗

    26 May 2016 · Heidi Connor · Nottinghamshire

    “I was advised that EMAS has had to invoke such a Plan (to at least level 3) for 9 out of the last 12 months.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    East Midlands Ambulance Service responded, stating 2 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “In 2015/16, the trust carried out a significant recruitment campaign and educated 350 whole time equivalent frontline posts.”

    Web search (Tavily): Evidence found that the action was carried out

    East of England Ambulance: Plan to recruit 350 staff ↗
    “EMAS has taken the CQC findings seriously and value the additional support from other NHS organisations following the CQC Quality Summit. With their input EMAS can progress areas that cannot be fixed quickly, or that are not within EMAS' immediate control.”

    Stated timescale: 2016/17

  2. 3 years 8 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Gordon Gillott↗

    4 Feb 2020 · Emma Serrano · Derby and Derbyshire

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “there is a risk of future death if urgent transfers are not available to acutely ill patients due to resourcing issues.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    East Midlands Ambulance Service responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to East Midlands Ambulance Service

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error