Skip to content
recurance

Lack of clear protocol for managing sickle cell crises in prisons

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2014–2024No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

NHS England received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 26 Sept 2014 and 31 Oct 2024.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from NHS England was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2014–2024
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Emmanuel Akinmuyiwa↗

    26 Sept 2014 · Louise Hunt · Birmingham & Solihull

    “Evidence at the inquest confirmed that there needed to be a clear protocol in the West Midlands for the management of patients with Sickle cell disease.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from NHS England was found for this report.

  2. 10 years 1 month later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Wayne Bayley↗

    31 Oct 2024 · Mary Hassell · Inner North London

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “I am not at all clear that this work has been replicated nationally.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗
  3. All reports to NHS England

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error