Skip to content
recurance

Overdue CPA meetings and missing discharge care plans

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2018–2021No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 9 May 2018 and 29 Mar 2021.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
1
coroner
2018–2021
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Lewis Colgan↗

    9 May 2018 · Crispin Butler · Buckinghamshire

    “There did not appear to be a robust reactive process for alerting members of the care team in relation to overdue Care Programme Approach (CPA) meetings nor a proactive approach to addressing the scheduling of these.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report.

  2. 2 years 11 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Roy Morris↗

    29 Mar 2021 · Crispin Butler · Buckinghamshire

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
    “The application of the CPA policy for patients such as [the deceased] so that they will have a detailed care plan with which they can engage and which informs the family, the care coordinator and the community team on discharge from the inpatient setting.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:careteam

    Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “To focus on the role of the Care Coordinator: the expectations of the role and the interventions and engagement required in discharge planning in line with our CPA policy.”

    Stated timescale: early June 2021

  3. All reports to Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error