Skip to content
recurance

Lack of contingency planning for patient departure

Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high2 reports · 2015–2017 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 12 Nov 2015 and 23 Oct 2017.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 3 specific actions.

2
reports
1
coroner
2015–2017
years
0.85
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Matthew Groom↗

    12 Nov 2015 · ME Hassell · London Inner (North)

    “The mental health nurse who then saw him did not consider what action to take if he should suddenly decide to leave, most particularly given that she felt unable to conclude the assessment without waiting for a doctor to come in from home to assist.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 2 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “We have strengthened the direct mental health referral protocol from Whittington Emergency Department (ED) triage to the Camden and Islington Mental Health Liaison Team Service, so that patients attending Whittington Emergency who need to see a mental health professional can be immediately and directly referred. This mental health referral protocol was in place before your inquest into Mr [name redacted] death, but has since been significantly strengthened in that the patient themselves can now trigger”
    “We have strengthened the direct mental health referral protocol from Whittington Emergency Department (ED) triage to the Camden and Islington Mental Health Liaison Team Service, so that patients attending Whittington Emergency who need to see a mental health professional can be immediately and directly referred. This mental health referral protocol was in place before your inquest into Mr [name redacted] death, but has since been significantly strengthened in that the patient themselves can now trigger”
  2. 1 year 11 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Sian Witheridge↗

    23 Oct 2017 · ME Hassell · London Inner (North)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high
    “One of the crisis team nurses made a plan for a risk assessment to be carried out before Ms [name redacted] took any leave. However, this was an unenforceable plan, because Highbury Grove is an open facility.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:assessmentleave

    Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “we have been working with One Housing to enable members of their staff to acquire access to our IT system. We are aiming to have shared access in place in early 2018 following staff completing the relevant training and necessary checks.”

    Stated timescale: early 2018

  3. All reports to Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error