Skip to content
recurance

Insufficient police resources to respond to critical calls

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2019–2025 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Home Office received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 12 Aug 2019 and 4 Sept 2025.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
1
coroner
2019–2025
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Karen Burns↗

    12 Aug 2019 · Louise Hunt · Birmingham and Solihull

    “I heard evidence at the inquest that this call was graded incorrectly. It should have been graded as a P2 call with a response time within 60minutes. I also heard evidence to confirm that the large number of P1 calls that evening meant that even if the call had been correctly graded it would not have been answered as all available resources were required for the P1 calls (15 minutes response).”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Home Office responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “| will ask Home Office officials to contact West Midlands Police to identify if any remedial or additional measures need to be put in place to ensure calls are handled appropriately”

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    National Call Handling ↗
  2. 6 years 1 month later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Khalif Mohammed↗

    4 Sept 2025 · Louise Hunt · Birmingham and Solihull

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “West Midlands Police had insufficient resources to allocate police officers to deal with [the deceased]'s case on 06/01/25 which was classed as a priority case with expected allocation of resources within an hour.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:resourceswithin

    Home Office responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Home Office

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error