Lack of multi-agency coordination for high-risk offenders
Ministry of Justice received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 19 Jul 2019 and 21 Jul 2022.
They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.
A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“no local MAPPA 1 meetings, no inter-agency meetings and no significant inter-agency communications regarding the perpetrator, no detailing of his licence conditions, and no information regarding either his nature or the trigger factors for his offending”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Ministry of Justice responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗
“proposed. | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following [name redacted]: a: DPG Solicitors”
Stated timescale: by 3rd September 2019
- 3 years laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
“there is no policy/procedure/guidance encouraging consideration to be given to the issues of whether and when to hold multi- agency meetings for the purposes of sharing information about the offender”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:meetingsinformation
The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.
- All reports to Ministry of Justice
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2019 → 2022Lewis Powter3 years after Cherylee Shennan · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderateBoth reports highlight the absence of any formal process requiring agencies to meet and share information about high‑risk offenders after release. The earlier case concerns MAPPA Level 1 management; the later case concerns IPP offenders not under MAPPA but still needing multi‑agency coordination.
Cherylee Shennan · 19 Jul 2019
“no local MAPPA 1 meetings, no inter-agency meetings and no significant inter-agency communications regarding the perpetrator, no detailing of his licence conditions, and no information regarding either his nature or the trigger factors for his offending”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Lewis Powter · 21 Jul 2022
“there is no policy/procedure/guidance encouraging consideration to be given to the issues of whether and when to hold multi- agency meetings for the purposes of sharing information about the offender”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Stated action · timescale: by 3rd September 2019
“proposed. | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following [name redacted]: a: DPG Solicitors”
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No published response from Ministry of Justice was found for this report. It is the most recent report, so a response may not be due or published yet.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to Ministry of Justice at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 → 2022 | 0.71 | 0.20 | Closely related · 0.80 | different |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
Other chains for Ministry of Justice
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.