Skip to content
recurance

Lack of clear information sharing protocols between probation and other agencies

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2024–2025 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Ministry of Justice received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 29 May 2024 and 22 Jan 2025.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 4 specific actions.

2
reports
1
coroner
2024–2025
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Elizabeth McCann↗

    29 May 2024 · Alison Mutch · Manchester South

    “Clear Information Sharing protocols between Probation and such groups as drug and alcohol services were limited. Without clear agreements understood by both sides there was a significant risk that crucial information that impacted risk assessments would not be shared.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Ministry of Justice responded, stating 3 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “The Trust recognises that, at the time of the incident the College did not have a clear written protocol in place to manage risk. As an educational establishment the College did not have plans or processes in place to communicate effectively with other teams within the Trust such as the clinical teams or externally to organisations such as the Probation Service about the risk of harm occurring to others. The College is bound by Trust policies in relation to safeguarding and the College team did”
    “the Head of Public Protection at Greater Manchester Police and the Head of Public Protection at Greater Manchester Probation service commenced monthly meetings in 2023.”

    Stated timescale: 2023

    1 more stated action in the Promises tab.

  2. 8 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Nathan Shepherd↗

    22 Jan 2025 · Alison Mutch · Manchester South

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “Evidence from Probation and Prison staff showed a lack of understanding of how the prison system could update the probation system and where that information could be found.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:Probationinformation

    Ministry of Justice responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The Barricade Guidance referred to in evidence given at the Inquest hearing has now been finalised and is going through the final stages of sign off prior to issue to all approved premises staff on 1st August 2025. This guidance will form part of the Safe Working Practice document and staff will be required to acknowledge receipt and their understanding by the end of September 2025. This will be overseen by all Approved Premises Managers.”

    Stated timescale: 1st August 2025 and end of September 2025

  3. All reports to Ministry of Justice

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error