← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Lack of electronic access to primary care medical notes

Organisation: Department of Health and Social Care · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/f7d8b43f3a5df6de

The earlier warning

Audrey Kelly · 8 Apr 2014 · John Pollard, Manchester (South)

“neither they nor the hospital Emergency Departments, have direct access to GP [name redacted]”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/audrey-kelly

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Audrey Kelly (8 Apr 2014) · stated timescale: none stated

“The CCG have confirmed that [the deceased] had a shared record which was available to view and which included her allergy to the antibiotic specified in your report.”

judiciary.uk/…/2014-0155-Response-by-Department-of-Health.pdf

Stated action 2 · response to Audrey Kelly (8 Apr 2014) · stated timescale: none stated

“Stockport CCG is already enagaged in continual improvement work in this area. However, as a result of this investigation, the CCG is also planning the following measures: © to seek formal assurance from Mastercall about processes for new starters and contingency plans for when practitioners do not have Smartcards”

judiciary.uk/…/2014-0155-Response-by-Department-of-Health2.pdf

What recurred

  • 15 May 2017 · Stephen Leven · R Brittain · Identical hazard · confidence 0.90 (high)
  • 28 Jan 2026 · Akhona Moyo · Hassan Shah · Identical hazard · confidence 0.95 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Audrey Kelly · 8 Apr 2014

“neither they nor the hospital Emergency Departments, have direct access to GP [name redacted]”

Later · Akhona Moyo · 28 Jan 2026

“Hospital doctors, including in the Emergency Department and Paediatrics, do not have electronic access to primary care medical notes e.g. GP notes, community mental health notes etc.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.