← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Inadequate family communication and documentation

Organisation: South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/df18ab8e45a2a137

The earlier warning

Natasha Raghoo · 6 Mar 2014 · David Skipp, West Sussex

“Communications between staff and family were haphazard the policy of involving family in care planning was not clear.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/natasha-raghoo

What was promised

A published response was found, but no specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.

What recurred

  • 21 Mar 2018 · Edward Lundy · Tony Williams · Closely related · confidence 0.78 (moderate)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Natasha Raghoo · 6 Mar 2014

“Communications between staff and family were haphazard the policy of involving family in care planning was not clear.”

Later · Edward Lundy · 21 Mar 2018

“That upon [the deceased]'s discharge into the care of his family, there should have been independent consultation with the family and this should have been documented with the tisks being explicitly discussed.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.