← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Inadequate ACCT documentation and healthcare absence during reviews

Organisation: HMP Woodhill · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/da2ef016e762787e

The earlier warning

Ian Brown · 26 May 2016 · Thomas Osborne, Milton Keynes

“(1)During the course of the evidence | was referred to the most recent report from the HM Inspector of Prisons that highlighted”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/ian-brown

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Ian Brown (26 May 2016) · stated timescale: none stated

“The prison is also implementing a system to provide each offender supported through the ACCT process with a designated case manager throughout the period for which the ACCT remains open.”

judiciary.uk/…/2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS.pdf

What recurred

  • 6 Nov 2019 · Darren Williams · Tom Osborne · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Ian Brown · 26 May 2016

“(1)During the course of the evidence | was referred to the most recent report from the HM Inspector of Prisons that highlighted”

Later · Darren Williams · 6 Nov 2019

“it became apparent during the course of the evidence that ACCT reviews were being conducted on many occasions without someone from Healthcare being in attendance.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.