Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports
Pre-inquest brief
SASH form not identified or completed at reception
The earlier warning
Sheldon Woodford · 16 May 2016 · Sarah Whitby, Hampshire Central
“That in the reception process the SASH document is not identifiable to all relevant staff.”
judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/sheldon-woodford
What was promised
No published response from HMP Winchester was found for the earlier reports.
What recurred
- 21 Jun 2019 · Michael Folley · Karen Harrold · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)
The clearest link, quoted from both reports:
Earlier · Sheldon Woodford · 16 May 2016
“That in the reception process the SASH document is not identifiable to all relevant staff.”
Later · Michael Folley · 21 Jun 2019
“The suicide/self harm warning alert (SASH) at page 9 of the PER was meant to be completed if there was a risk of self-harm or suicide since arrest or within the last month. In other words, it was felt the relevant period to be considered was not just the current period of detention but also anything relevant within a month before arrest.”
What happened next
No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.