← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Lack of lead practitioner during transfer leading to lost follow up

Organisation: Sussex Partnership NHS Trust · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/c41614d36a7bb235

The earlier warning

Paul Hyde · 5 Dec 2014 · Veronica Hamilton-Deeley, Brighton & Hove

“There seems to be no facility for the Psychiatrist to be involved in the assessment procedure and indicate a course him or herself. There should be. In any event, no contact was made with the GP and there is apparently no follow up system so no one seems to have picked up”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/paul-hyde

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Paul Hyde (5 Dec 2014) · stated timescale: none stated

“A further action was a review of the triage function/process to include increased involvement from Consultant [name redacted] and additional members of ATS. All clinical triage meetings have a Consultant [name redacted], lead nurse, and administrator present. Following Mr [name redacted] neues Associate Specialist has been invited to attend the triage meetings on a regular basis.”

judiciary.uk/…/2014-0527-Response-by-Sussex-Partnership-NHS.pdf

Stated action 2 · response to George Rogers (27 Nov 2019) · stated timescale: 7 days

“Allocation of a Lead Practitioner of patients transferred from the CRHTT and ATS”

judiciary.uk/…/2019-0484-Response-from-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-F…

What recurred

  • 27 Nov 2019 · George Rogers · Joanne Andrews
  • 15 Mar 2021 · Timothy Steele · Veronica Hamilton-Deeley · Identical hazard · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · George Rogers · 27 Nov 2019

“When transferring patients between the CHRTT and ATS there is not always a Lead Practitioner appointed on transfer which may (a) delay patients receiving treatment and (b) mean that patients may not be monitored pending the appointment.”

Later · Timothy Steele · 15 Mar 2021

“Mr [name redacted] was lost to ATS follow up apparently due to inefficient processes and a failure to appreciate the urgent need to appoint a Lead Practitioner for him.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.