← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Excessive waiting time for psychotherapy

Organisation: Tameside and Glossop Clinical Commissioning Group · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/ba5fd0132c107c07

The earlier warning

John Derwent · 4 Jun 2018 · Alison Mutch, Manchester (South)

“The Inquest heard that the target time for an appointment for CBT should be 6 weeks. At the time Mr [name redacted] was referred, the waiting time was 12 months.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/john-derwent

What was promised

No published response from Tameside and Glossop Clinical Commissioning Group was found for the earlier reports.

What recurred

  • 12 Feb 2019 · Heather Carey · Andrew Bridgman · Closely related · confidence 0.80 (moderate)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · John Derwent · 4 Jun 2018

“The Inquest heard that the target time for an appointment for CBT should be 6 weeks. At the time Mr [name redacted] was referred, the waiting time was 12 months.”

Later · Heather Carey · 12 Feb 2019

“A target waiting list of 18 weeks is far too long but | was told that this was a funding issue.”

What happened next

No evidence found either way · a stated action in a response

“This document can be downloaded from our website.”

Quality Standards for Psychological Therapies Services · rcpsych.ac.uk/…/appts-standards-3rd-edition.pdf?sfvrsn=64384490…

“Administration and Policy in Mental Health · 2024-05-11 · 52(1):210-222”

Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11703940

No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.