← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Poor record keeping in missing person investigations

Organisation: Department of Health and Social Care · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/b1fd9327695ebc14

The earlier warning

Edith Robinson · 19 Jul 2017 · Lisa Hashmi, Manchester (North)

“the standard of record keeping by both doctors and nurses was poor.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/edith-robinson

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Edith Robinson (19 Jul 2017) · stated timescale: none stated

“the Trust has agreed that all patients will be reviewed daily by the medical team and that the Trust is currently looking to ensure that all trauma patients with severe systemic illness will be reviewed daily by a medical doctor. This will be monitored through Trust audits.”

judiciary.uk/…/Edith-Robinson-Response.pdf

Stated action 2 · response to Thomas Jackson (13 Nov 2018) · stated timescale: 8 January 2019

“In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action.”

judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2018-0352.pdf

Stated action 3 · response to Thomas Jackson (13 Nov 2018) · stated timescale: none stated

“My officials have made enquiries with a number of bodies on the matter of concern in your report that there should be routine therapeutic blood monitoring (testing of blood plasma levels) in patients who are prescribed clozapine.”

judiciary.uk/…/2018-0352-Response-from-DHSC.pdf

What recurred

  • 13 Nov 2018 · Thomas Jackson · Andrew Haigh · Identical hazard · confidence 0.95 (high)
  • 21 Jul 2022 · Gaia Pope-Sutherland · Rachael Griffin · Identical hazard · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Edith Robinson · 19 Jul 2017

“the standard of record keeping by both doctors and nurses was poor.”

Later · Thomas Jackson · 13 Nov 2018

“During the hearing it was noted that on a number of occasions record keeping was poor.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.