← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Inaccurate medical information provided to DVLA by drivers

Organisation: Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/aed2cd911a23f1e2

The earlier warning

Henry Prow · 11 Sept 2017 · Emma Carlyon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly

“There was concern, that the driver's GP/doctors could have a conflict of interests in such situations as they would have a duty to inform the DVLA of medical issues”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/henry-prow

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Ian Harris (30 Dec 2024) · stated timescale: none stated

“The DVLA will continue to work closely with all relevant stakeholders to raise awareness of the impact medical conditions may have on fitness to drive and continue to explore any potential options for further improvements”

judiciary.uk/…/2025-0031-Response-from-DVLA.pdf

What recurred

  • 30 Dec 2024 · Ian Harris · John Ellery · Closely related · confidence 0.70 (moderate)
  • 12 Nov 2025 · Christopher Sampson · Adam Hodson · Closely related · confidence 0.80 (moderate)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Ian Harris · 30 Dec 2024

“For whatever reason the deceased did not seek the medical report from his own GP, who would have known about his medical condition and who therefore would not have been able to support the application.”

Later · Christopher Sampson · 12 Nov 2025

“I heard evidence in this inquest concerning the requirement of drivers' to self-notify the DVLA of any medical conditions that may interfere with their driving.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.