← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Inadequate note keeping of nasogastric tube placement

Organisation: Department of Health and Social Care · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/95e8b8214ac47e74

The earlier warning

Frederick Davidson · 14 Oct 2013 · Martin Flemimg, Surrey

“Staff's note keeping practices, in relation to the placement of the nasogastric tube, were inadequate.”

judiciary.uk/…/davidson-2013-0258

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Amanda Coulthard (18 Jan 2017) · stated timescale: 21 April 2017

“Boards were asked to assess and address compliance issues by 21 April 2017”

judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2017-0024-Response.pdf

Stated action 2 · response to Michael Parke (18 Jan 2017) · stated timescale: 21 April 2017

“Boards were asked to assess and address compliance issues by 21 April 2017”

judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2017-0024-Response.pdf

What recurred

  • 18 Jan 2017 · Amanda Coulthard · David Roberts · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)
  • 18 Jan 2017 · Michael Parke · David Roberts
  • 22 Feb 2022 · Van Tuyen · Jonathan Stevens · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Michael Parke · 18 Jan 2017

“Common themes in all were: (a) _ Staff not being aware of the policy.”

Later · Van Tuyen · 22 Feb 2022

“The court heard that there is no unified approach to address the on going issue of avoidable deaths caused by using misplaced nasogastric tubes.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.