← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Helmet not required for motorised bicycles and trikes

Organisation: Department for Transport · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/8d2dd651593fe3ba

The earlier warning

Donald Spooner · 5 May 2014 · Karen Henderson, West Sussex

“That it is not compulsory to wear a suitable protective helmet whilst travelling on a motorised bicycle which can reach speeds in excess of 15 MPH”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/donald-spooner

What was promised

A published response was found, but no specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.

What recurred

  • 5 Oct 2016 · Colin Wellings · Andrew Barkley · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Donald Spooner · 5 May 2014

“That it is not compulsory to wear a suitable protective helmet whilst travelling on a motorised bicycle which can reach speeds in excess of 15 MPH”

Later · Colin Wellings · 5 Oct 2016

“(1) The machine that the deceased was riding was a domestically manufactured machine with a 3.5 litre engine registered in 1973 and as such was exempt from the requirement for the driver/rider to wear either a seatbelt or a protective helmet.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.