Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports
Pre-inquest brief
Inadequate information access in GMP systems
The earlier warning
Adele Blakeman · 15 Apr 2016 · Joanne Kearsley, Manchester South
“The GMP computer system hinders officers and does not afford them easy access to important information within the time scales they have available to them, in order for them to adequately assess a situation.”
judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/adele-blakeman
What was promised
Stated action 1 · response to Adele Blakeman (15 Apr 2016) · stated timescale: late 2017
“GMP is investing significantly in the replacement of technology through the IS Transformation Programme to replace existing separate command and control, custody, intelligence, work allocation, and property systems with one user experience and a more intelligence information management process that enables partner agency information sharing (iOPS). The programme will also improve integration of components outside of these core systems, replace ageing data warehouse capabilities and moving to a data”
judiciary.uk/…/2016-0145-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Police.…
What recurred
- 18 Nov 2020 · Alfie Gildea · Alison Mutch · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)
The clearest link, quoted from both reports:
Earlier · Adele Blakeman · 15 Apr 2016
“The GMP computer system hinders officers and does not afford them easy access to important information within the time scales they have available to them, in order for them to adequately assess a situation.”
Later · Alfie Gildea · 18 Nov 2020
“was unclear where the information that an individual met the | criteria for a serial and serious DA Perpetrator should or did sit in | GMPs systems”
What happened next
No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.