← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Long waiting times for psychological assessment

Organisation: Department of Health and Social Care · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/6e7bfd2bf0c31764

The earlier warning

John Haines · 16 Nov 2017 · Lisa Hashmi, Manchester (North)

“Timely access to Healthy Minds is also hindered by long waiting times.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/john-haines

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to John Haines (16 Nov 2017) · stated timescale: May 2017

“The CCG commissioned a new Primary Care Mental Health Pathway during 2016/17, which mobilised in May 2017. The model has been developed to respond to the local population needs, preparing service users to access therapy in order to optimise recovery performance. The service is subject to robust a performance dependent payment framework which provides assurance of performance delivery.”

judiciary.uk/…/2017-0402-Response-by-Heywood-Middleton-and-Roch…

What recurred

  • 18 Oct 2024 · Robin Ward · Hassan Shah · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · John Haines · 16 Nov 2017

“Timely access to Healthy Minds is also hindered by long waiting times.”

Later · Robin Ward · 18 Oct 2024

“Another particular problem identified was the long waiting times for psychological assessment.”

What happened next

No evidence found either way · stated action 1

“Benefits of Mental Health Treatment in Primary Care”

Benefits of Mental Health Treatment in Primary Care - NeuroFlow · neuroflow.com/benefits-mental-health-treatment-primary-care

“Evolving Models of Behavioral Health Integration in Primary Care”

[PDF] Evolving Models of Behavioral Health Integration in Primary Care · milbank.org/…/EvolvingCare.pdf

No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.