← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Misinterpretation of centile chart guidance leading to delayed recognition of fe

Organisation: Department of Health and Social Care · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/58d66d4b8c9593f8

The earlier warning

Jos Tartese-Joy · 31 Dec 2021 · Alison Mutch, Greater Manchester South

“guidance nationally was not to look at this but to look at the % weight _ change between the last weight and the new weight.”

judiciary.uk/…/jos-tartese-joy-prevention-of-future-deaths-repo…

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Jos Tartese-Joy (31 Dec 2021) · stated timescale: 2023/24

“I note that it was found that there was no nationally recognised way of flagging in maternity notes that a pregnancy is considered high-risk. As a consequence, the community midwife and GP were not aware that the pregnancy was high-risk, and additionally the mother herself was not explicitly counselled about this.”

judiciary.uk/…/2021-0435-Response-from-DHSC.pdf

What recurred

  • 6 Jun 2025 · Esme Atkinson · Alison Mutch · Closely related · confidence 0.80 (moderate)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Jos Tartese-Joy · 31 Dec 2021

“guidance nationally was not to look at this but to look at the % weight _ change between the last weight and the new weight.”

Later · Esme Atkinson · 6 Jun 2025

“tracking weight on the centile chart even from an early point assisted in understanding if there was a significant issue in relation to feeding triggering professional curiosity.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.