← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Missed or delayed diagnosis of severe brain injury

Organisation: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/45756a5767a49571

The earlier warning

Selina Broadhurst · 17 Feb 2014 · John Pollard, Manchester (South)

“The Emergency Department doctors indicated that they could not get a CT of the head because "the NICE Guidelines do not indicate as being appropriate where there are no obvious neurological signs".”

judiciary.uk/…/selina-broadhurst

What was promised

No published response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence was found for the earlier reports.

What recurred

  • 15 Jul 2015 · Karen O'Brien · Roy Palmer · Closely related · confidence 0.80 (moderate)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Selina Broadhurst · 17 Feb 2014

“The Emergency Department doctors indicated that they could not get a CT of the head because "the NICE Guidelines do not indicate as being appropriate where there are no obvious neurological signs".”

Later · Karen O'Brien · 15 Jul 2015

“The NICE guidance is stated to be a recommendation. It must therefore be presumed not to be applied slavishly without careful assessment.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.