← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Absence of smoke alarms in dwelling

Organisation: Leeds City Council · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/3810ac4e4aa182c2

The earlier warning

Julie Ann Camm · 17 Jan 2014 · David Hincliff, West Yorkshire (East)

“there were no smoke alarms fitted to the property.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/julie-ann-camm

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Julie Ann Camm (17 Jan 2014) · stated timescale: April 2014 to March 2015

“The coroner has reported that there is a risk of future deaths owing to the fact that there were no smoke detectors fitted to the property. A partial re-wire had taken place in 2008, but no hard wired detection equipment installed, as per the existing Electrical Specification (in which hard-wired smoke detectors are only required to be installed as part of a full re-wire).”

judiciary.uk/…/2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council.pdf

What recurred

  • 23 Jun 2021 · Netlyn Robinson · Lorraine Harris · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Julie Ann Camm · 17 Jan 2014

“there were no smoke alarms fitted to the property.”

Later · Netlyn Robinson · 23 Jun 2021

“there appeared to be no process in place to check premises had heating, running water or smoke alarms and therefore was fit and safe for a vulnerable person to return to”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.