← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Lack of formal mental health act assessment

Organisation: Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/2ac531efd3b4343c

The earlier warning

Anthony Buckingham · 9 Apr 2019 · Daniel Sharpstone, Suffolk

“Formal mental health act assessment”

judiciary.uk/…/anthony-buckingham

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Anthony Buckingham (9 Apr 2019) · stated timescale: none stated

“Daily visits from the mental health team”

judiciary.uk/…/2019-0123-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Tr…

Stated action 2 · response to Anthony Buckingham (9 Apr 2019) · stated timescale: none stated

“The Trust obtains assurance of this improvement through means such as audit and its quality and safety reviews”

judiciary.uk/…/2019-0123-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Tr…

Stated action 3 · response to Anthony Buckingham (9 Apr 2019) · stated timescale: none stated

“The report doesn't identify at which stage of care a request for a mental health act assessment may have been appropriate”

judiciary.uk/…/2019-0123-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Tr…

2 further stated actions are listed on the full chain page.

What recurred

  • 12 Dec 2019 · Peter Frosdick · Yvonne Blake · Closely related · confidence 0.80 (moderate)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Anthony Buckingham · 9 Apr 2019

“Formal mental health act assessment”

Later · Peter Frosdick · 12 Dec 2019

“no-one appeared to have looked at his mental health except to note that he was alcohol dependant”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.