← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Antibiotic prescribing without joint discussion or swallow assessment

Organisation: Tameside General Hospital · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/158d020574ffa462

The earlier warning

Jordan Howarth · 1 May 2024 · Alison Mutch, Manchester South

“there was not a joint approach to his care and no detailed discussions regarding the decision to withhold antibiotics”

judiciary.uk/…/jordan-howarth-prevention-of-future-deaths-report

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Jordan Howarth (1 May 2024) · stated timescale: September 2024

“The joint approach to Mr [name redacted] care from both the microbiologist and the consultant physician, specifically around the decision to withhold antibiotics.”

judiciary.uk/…/2024-0236-Response-from-Tameside-and-Glossop-Int…

Stated action 2 · response to Jordan Howarth (1 May 2024) · stated timescale: September 2024

“The documentation from the ICU consultant setting out/not setting out their rationale, specifically no discussions' between the medical consultant and the ICU consultant within the medical notes”

judiciary.uk/…/2024-0236-Response-from-Tameside-and-Glossop-Int…

Stated action 3 · response to Jordan Howarth (1 May 2024) · stated timescale: April 2024

“The Trusts' policy around NEWS2 escalation had not been followed”

judiciary.uk/…/2024-0236-Response-from-Tameside-and-Glossop-Int…

What recurred

  • 17 Jun 2026 · Catherine Kirkham · Jyoti Gill · Closely related · confidence 0.80 (moderate)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Jordan Howarth · 1 May 2024

“there was not a joint approach to his care and no detailed discussions regarding the decision to withhold antibiotics”

Later · Catherine Kirkham · 17 Jun 2026

“prescription of oral antibiotics without conducting a swallow assessment in a patient presenting with swallowing difficulties and lockjaw”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.